Skip to main content

Automatic Safety

Image result for passive seat beltsAutomatic or passive seat belts, the great compromise between automakers and the United States government. Passive seat belts were one of those “safety” products that cause more harm than good for the end user. It was much hated by consumers and led to them only having a short life from 1990 to 1995. Now why were these seat belts a thing in the first place?
Image result for 1975 volkswagen golfWell the passive seat belts were invented by Volkswagen in 1972 and was first used in the Volkswagen Golf in 1975. This lead the Brock Adam, the United States Secretary of Transportation, to mandated that every car in to have either automatic seat belts or airbags by 1983. Now this angered many lobbyist who thought this was a way too soon of a deadline. In 1981 the mandate was dropped then transferred to the Supreme Court which lead to the mandate to stay, but now with an extended deadline of 1990. Now airbags were still a relatively new system which meant it was pretty expensive. Thus many car companies decided to go with passive seat belts since it was the cheaper option. Now why was this mandated purposed in the first place? Well because people never wear their seat belts, so the government view of this was if people did not wear seat belts on their of accord, then have the car do it for them. Plus in 1978 it was showed that passive seat belts fatality rate was .78 per 100 million miles compared with manual seat belts 2.34 per 100 million miles.

The most common form of automatic seat belts is the one which travels along the door frame. How this works is that once the driver is in the seat and turns the car on, the shoulder belt would whirrrr from the bottom of the A pillar on the car, all along the door frame and to the resting position on the middle of the B pillar. The reverse process would happen when the door would be open or the engine shut off. There would be a control module (mostly located under the passenger seat) that controls the motor and switches on these passive seat belts. The fault of these automatic seat belts is that there was a manual lap belt that HAS TO BE WORN alongside with the automatic shoulder belt. Most would think that they are safe with just the shoulder belt, which is completely false. This is highly dangerous because in an event of a crash, depending on speed, the lack of a lap belt would cause the occupant to either slide up and out of their seat or hit their head against the roof, or worse get strangled or even worse get decapitated by the belt.  

Image result for automatic seat belt

As you can see the passive seat belts did not attract many fans. A lot of people find the belts annoying and frustrating. Many consumers found that cars that had passive seat belts instead of airbags as an major turn off. Since it is one more component to break, when they broke many people leave them broken, causing even more of a risk. The biggest problem, for me anyways, is that why have an automatic seat belt system if you still have to manually put on the lap belt. This makes the whole thing redundant and better off with having a regular three point seat belt, at least that does not chop your head off. If worn correctly, passive seat belts are great at its job of protecting its occupants even though they are quite redundant. Plus they make a great party trick.   

A Demo of the seat belts in action in a 1991Toyota Corolla




source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seat_belt

Comments

  1. There’s a cool novelty for these seat belts. Like you said they are useless since the lap belt exists. Anyways, I liked the blog!

    ReplyDelete
  2. These safety belts were special features on older vehicles and would be a unique element on cars nowadays, but after reading into the imperfections and major hazards along with unforeseeable deceitfulness built into these belts, I think I'll rather have the belt that will save my life than one which will make my car look high-tech! Great post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Apple's Downfall

Apple Newton, Apple’s struggles summed up in one device. The Newton was a PDA (Personal Digital Assistant) that was released in the early 1990s. During this time, Steve Jobs quit and left his own company because of internal conflicts, and left the CEO at the time John Sculley in charge. The Jobsless Apple was starting to struggle and was “experimenting” with many ideas including digital cameras and video games, but nothing seem to stick. And one of these experiments was the Apple Newton. Now Apple’s PDA did not go mainstream and was swept under the rug for a reason. Before that, It is time to talk about the development of the Newton. It was released in 1993 and was the first to have handwriting recognition. The Newton developed cycle was a smooth throughout, except towards the middle, for the company and their first time creating such a device. Apple was able to get a custom AISC chip with 163 mhz that was quite powerful for a portable device at the time and energy efficient. It ra...

- . .-.. . --. .-. .- .--. ....

Telegraph, the first device to allow people to finally “text “ one-another even an ocean away. I would be writing about more specifically about the electric telegraph.Basically a telegraph is a machine that is able to send information through Morse’s code. The telegraph was the first to send information to one place to another no matter the distance and in a matter of minutes! This means that important information like treaties, war status, etc could be sent without waiting weeks for a letter. The invention of the electric telegraph is mostly thank by two set of researchers: Sir William and Sir Charles Wheatstone also Samuel Morse and Alfred Vail. Morse and Vail helped to develop what now we know as Morse’s code which is made up of dots and dashes for each letter of the alphabet. While William and Charles are credited with building the machine itself in 1830s after the discovery of the first battery by Alessandro Volta and Hans Christian Oersted discovery of the connection betwe...

Produce, Crush, Recycle

EV1, the Prius of the late 1990s. I decided to celebrate Earth day with something that is the embodiment of going green… the electric car. I could have gone with Tesla or the previously mentioned Prius, but of course, those are cars as not obscure as the EV1 since they're either crashed or not legally allowed on the road anymore. The EV1, for those who did not see the video in Economics last year, stands for the creative name Electric Vehicle 1 and one of the first mass produce modern electric car. The car soon had a created major up roar by buyers because of GM repossession them and crushing them. The creation of the EV1 started when California CARB or California Air Resource Board in the 1990s started to impose stricter emission due to combat the horrible air pollution at the time. The air quality was so bad in California that it was worse than the other 49 states combined. Thus strongly encouraged major car companies like GM, Honda, Toyota, etc to create emission free veh...